Humanities Resource Center Online
Font Size: 
 
 
A PROJECT OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

     
       

Part I. Primary and Secondary Education in the Humanities

Section C. Primary- and Secondary-School Faculty

Print Section
Indicator I-9 Qualifications of Humanities Teachers
Indicator I-10 Demographic Characteristics
Indicator I-11 Humanities Teachers’ Salaries and Job Satisfaction

While the kinds of student outcomes discussed thus far are perhaps the most important means of assessing the state of primary and secondary education, valuable perspectives on the state of the humanities can also be gained from looking at the characteristics of those who teach such courses. Indeed, because standardized exams taken by students can measure only a limited set of acquired skills and because data on their course-taking give no indication of the quality of courses taken, one must look at rough measures of teacher qualifications and satisfaction to get a fuller picture of students’ experiences in humanities classrooms.

Beyond what teacher-focused indicators indicate about the quality of students’ early educational experiences in the humanities, such indicators are also important in and of themselves: primary- and secondary-school teachers are professionals whose qualifications, livelihoods, and feelings of job satisfaction are integral to the humanities infrastructure. Without capable and engaged humanities educators, the future of the humanities in the United States is in jeopardy.

This section looks first at teacher backgrounds and qualifications, examining to what extent teachers in the humanities are prepared to teach their subjects. The focus then turns to the distribution of faculty across subject areas and, further, to the demographic characteristics of humanities teachers. Finally, trends in teacher salaries and satisfaction levels are described.

Back to Top

Indicator I-9 Qualifications of Humanities Teachers
Print I-9
Updated (8/5/2010).

Updated (12/11/09) with data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) 2003–4 Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS). Trend line for the percentage of high school students instructed by a teacher with a postsecondary degree in the subject being taught has been extended back to 1988.

Although more current data on the characteristics of humanities teachers have been collected by NCES as part of the 2007–2008 round of the SASS, the information necessary to update this indicator is not available to the general public. A detailed analysis of the SASS microdata (i.e., “raw” or untabulated data) will be required to determine how the qualifications of precollegiate humanities teachers have changed over time. While NCES makes some microdata available in “public-use” format (one in which the data have been processed to ensure the confidentiality of survey respondents), the most current SASS data are available to researchers only on a “restricted-use” basis. The Academy is in the process of applying for permission to analyze these data and hopes to be able to update this indicator in late 2010.


An important measure of the condition of humanities education at the precollege level is the preparedness of teachers who teach humanities classes. Such preparedness can be partly assessed through information provided by the National Center for Education Statistics' (NCES) Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), which asks a sample of public school teachers about the fields in which they have received teaching certificates, as well as their undergraduate and graduate majors. Of course, teacher certification and subject-area education do not ensure quality teaching. Some gifted teachers have not obtained certification, and subject-matter specialization is no guarantee of effectiveness in the classroom. However, certification and education are two factors that research suggests have at least some bearing on student outcomes.1 They are also central to the public policy debate about teaching.

The data presented here describing humanities teacher qualifications are limited in two respects. For 2003–2004, the most recent academic year for which SASS results are publicly accessible, data for both measures are available for high school-level teachers only. Because middle school encompasses different grades in different states, NCES did not produce estimates of teacher qualifications for teachers at this level. Additionally, an improvement made in 2003–2004 in the way NCES collects data on teacher certification means that data for this academic year are not comparable with those collected in previous years.2 Thus, the trend analysis presented here for both high school and middle school teachers focuses exclusively on their educational backgrounds.

According to SASS data, public high school students in French classes were likeliest among those taking humanities courses to be exposed to a teacher who was both certified and possessed a degree in the subject matter being taught. In 2003–2004, 75% of all high school students taking French were taught by such a teacher (Figure I-9a). For the other languages the proportion ranged from 60% to approximately 70%, with English in the lead at 70.4%, a rate similar to those for the natural sciences (69.8%) and mathematics (65.0%). In the case of history, however, the rate was markedly lower. Although greater than 65% of students were taught by history teachers with degrees in the subject, low certification rates among history teachers meant that only 27% of history students found themselves in classes led by teachers meeting both preparedness criteria.

Figure 1-9a, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data
Figure 1-9b, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data

As Figure I-9b reveals, the most striking gains between 1988 and 2004 in exposure of high school students to degreed teachers have been achieved in history. Having remained in the 40–50% range for over a decade, the percentage of students taught history by someone with a degree in the subject jumped more than 20 percentage points between 2000 and 2004. A similarly sharp rise occurred in the level of student exposure to degreed instructors in the modern languages (other than English), although changes in the way NCES reports the qualifications of teachers of foreign languages makes gauging the precise magnitude of the increase difficult. The percentage of high schoolers learning English language and literature from an individual with a postsecondary degree in the subject increased steadily, if more incrementally, rising from 70% in 1988 to 83% in 2004, a trend similar to that observed in the natural sciences.

The most recent analysis of middle school teachers’ qualifications published by NCES, that for the 1999–2000 school year, reveal that in every subject besides arts and music the percentage of middle school students taught by degreed teachers was substantially smaller than the percentage of high schoolers taught by such teachers (Figure I-9c). This disparity has existed since data on teacher qualifications were first collected as part of the SASS in 1988. Despite this persistent gap, notably different trends were observed among middle school humanities subjects. The proportion of middle school students taught English by a degreed teacher rose modestly over the last decade of the 20th century, from 41% to 46%, a net increase that mirrored, as at the high school level, developments in the natural sciences. In contrast, the percentage of middle schoolers taught history by a degreed teacher declined by roughly the same increment, so that by 1999–2000, 31% of middle schoolers were learning history from a teacher with an academic background in the subject, a percentage similar to that for mathematics. In the most striking development at the middle school level during this time period, the percentage of students exposed to degreed foreign language teachers jumped 17 percentage points between 1991 and 1994, only to fall by a nearly identical amount over the next six years.

Figure 1-9c, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data


Notes

1 For a succinct review of the most recent literature, see Beth A. Morton et al., Education and Certification Qualifications of Departmentalized Public High School-Level Teachers of Core Subjects: Evidence from the 2003–04 Schools and Staffing Survey, Statistical Analysis Report NCES 2008-338 (Washington, DC: NCES, 2008), 5–7.

2 “The structure of the items concerning certification was revised in the 2003–2004 questionnaire. In 1999–2000, respondents reported whether or not they were certified in their main teaching assignment . . . . This method relied on teachers’ self-reports of the match between their main assignment (and other assignments) and their certification(s) held. There was evidence that allowing teachers to self-report their certification status led to the over-reporting of in-field certifications. As a result, the certification items were changed on the 2003–2004 Teacher Questionnaire. In an effort to improve the reliability of the items, separate questions were used to ask about main teaching assignment and certification. Respondents were first asked to identify the subject code for their main assignment and then, in a later section of the survey, to identify subject codes for all subjects covered by the certification(s) they held. A determination of whether or not teachers were certified in their main assignment is up to the analyst; the analyst is able to match the course taught with certification areas, rather than rely on teacher self-reports.” Morton et al., Education and Certification Qualifications, 57–58.

Back to Top

Indicator I-10 Demographic Characteristics
Print I-10

Updated (8/5/2010).

The data on which this indicator is based are for the 1999–2000 school year. Although more- current data on the characteristics of humanities teachers have been collected as part of the 2003–2004 and 2007–2008 rounds of the SASS, the information necessary to update this indicator is not available to the general public. The NCES has reported summary data from these more recent surveys (available at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006313), but these tabulations do not describe humanities teachers specifically. A detailed analysis of the SASS microdata (i.e., “raw” or untabulated data) is required to determine the size and composition of humanities precollegiate teaching. While NCES makes some microdata available in “public-use” format (one in which the data have been processed to ensure the confidentiality of survey respondents), the most current SASS data are available to researchers only on a "restricted-use" basis. The Academy is in the process of applying for permission to analyze these data and hopes to be able to update this indicator later this year.


The SASS provides a demographic snapshot of the nation's primary- and secondary-school teachers. These data reveal some continuities but also some striking discontinuities between the humanities and other subject areas with respect to the age, gender, and ethnic composition of primary- and secondary-school faculties.

In the 1999–2000 school year, the primary and secondary humanities faculty included a greater proportion of the oldest teachers than the faculty of any other subject (34% were aged 50 or older; Figure I-10a). Like teachers in the arts, math, and science, the majority of humanities teachers in 1999–2000 were female (Figure-I-10b). However, the disparity between the numbers of female and male teachers was more pronounced in the humanities than in math or science, the latter having been the most gender balanced of the primary and secondary faculties. With a teaching force that was 70% female, the gender distribution of humanities teachers was similar to that of arts teachers (these include teachers of studio art, dance, drama, and music). The particularly large percentage of women in the “all subjects” category stems from the inclusion of preschool, kindergarten, and general education elementary teachers, who were overwhelmingly female.

Figure 1-10a, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data
Figure 1-10b, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data

Due, in large measure, to the greater representation of Hispanics among primary- and secondary-school humanities teachers, the proportion of humanities posts held by members of ethnic minorities was greater than that of other disciplines (Figure I-10c). At the same time, though, the humanities faculty was much less ethnically diverse than the student population. Students were more than twice as likely as their teachers to be African American and more than three times as likely to be Asian. Although humanities teachers were considerably more likely to be Hispanic than their counterparts in the arts, math, or science, the proportion of Hispanic humanities teachers (7.2%) was small relative to the percentage of American school children of Hispanic descent (13.4%).

Figure 1-10c, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data

Back to Top

Indicator I-11 Humanities Teachers’ Salaries and Job Satisfaction
Print I-11
Updated (8/5/2010).

The data on which this indicator is based are for the 1999–2000 school year. Although more current data on the characteristics of humanities teachers have been collected as part of the 2003–2004 and 2007–2008 rounds of the SASS, the information necessary to update this indicator is not available to the general public. The NCES has reported summary data from these more recent surveys (available at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006313), but these tabulations do not describe humanities teachers specifically. A detailed analysis of the SASS microdata (i.e., “raw” or untabulated data) is required to determine the size and composition of the humanities precollegiate teacher corps. While NCES makes some microdata available in “public-use” format (one in which the data have been processed to ensure the confidentiality of survey respondents), the most current SASS data are available to researchers only on a "restricted-use" basis. The Academy is in the process of applying for permission to analyze these data and hopes to be able to update this indicator later this year.



Primary- and secondary-school teacher salaries in the humanities are one indicator of the value placed on humanities education (for faculty salaries at the postsecondary level, see Indicator III-14, Faculty Earnings). Because teaching salaries are closely tied to seniority, earnings data from the SASS are presented here by the career stage of respondents.

For the 1999–2000 academic year, the overwhelming majority (83%) of early career teachers (0–5 years in teaching) made $35,000 or less ($42,000 or less in 2007 dollars; Figure I-11a).1 By midcareer (10–15 years of service), 59% of teachers were making more than $35,000. Among the most seasoned teachers, or those with 25 or more years of service, 88% had crossed the $35,000 threshold, and over 60% were making in excess of $45,000 (or $54,000 in 2007 dollars).

Figure 1-11a, Full Size
Supporting Data Supporting Data

More than 40% of teachers of English/language arts, social studies (mostly history), and foreign languages indicated that if they “could go back to [their] college days and start over again,” they would certainly become teachers (Figure I-11b). This level of satisfaction was somewhat higher than that expressed by math and science teachers, 35% of whom indicated the same kind of enthusiasm for their teaching careers.

Figure 1-11b, Full Size


Note

1 Census 2000 “long-form” data indicate that national median earnings (for full-time, year round employees) were $33,000 in calendar year 1999. See Daniel H. Weinberg, “Evidence from Census 2000 about Earnings by Detailed Occupation for Men and Women,” Census 2000 Special Reports, no. 15 (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2004); available online at http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/censr-15.pdf.

Back to Top
Skip Navigation Links.  




View figures and graphics: